NFP II
In the defense of mucus…
Though I am sure many of you, if not all, are pretty much finished with the subject of Natural Family Planning, I thought that it would be silly to not speak to the subject since I am the woman in this relationship. It may sound somewhat nerdy, but quite frankly, I am of the mind that every woman should learn the principles behind NFP. Not only can you save yourself from spending hundreds of dollars on birth control methods, stop going to the doctor for completely natural conditions of your body, know you’re pregnant before you even skip a period, and minimize your exposure to a number of health risks (IUDs can cause uterine scarring, hormonal methods come with a number of possible risks including cardiovascular and increased infertility in older women to name only the bare minimum), you also get a much better sense of just what your body is up to and possibly recognize potential health concerns (like PCOS). Can you imagine being a teenage girl and knowing when you are at most risk of becoming pregnant? For some reason, I feel that that’s a moment of empowerment.
Abstaining or Waiting?
Though the principles behind NFP call for abstinence during one’s fertile phase, a similar birth control called the Fertility Awareness Method is exactly like NFP except for the use of barrier methods during the fertile phase. In other words, you’re not limited to waiting if you don’t want to. However, if one were to practice FAM, I think that you should consider the fact that most studies regarding the effectiveness of various forms of birth control occur over a woman’s entire cycle, i.e., even during those days when she is not fertile. So, instead of saying that a condom (without spermicides and used properly) is 96%* effective, it would be more like 81.6% effective since one has about an 85% of getting pregnant without birth control. Granted, I am not a statistician and I have not read all of the studies on the effectiveness of different forms of birth control, so I admit that my logic is somewhat faulty. For instance the 85% risk of getting pregnant is not saying that you are likely to get pregnant 85 times out of 100, but rather, that 85 woman out of 100 got pregnant when not using birth control over the course of one year. So, my calculation is more amateur than anything else. Regardless, with an effectiveness rate of ranging from 90-99%* when used correctly, NFP and FAM are worthwhile options for any woman even if she doesn’t have a husband to chart for her.
Of course…
*As with any statements about effectiveness, one needs to recognize who’s saying what and their investment in the product. I have not seen the studies that provide this statistical information first hand, and finding justifications of effectiveness rates used and the studies referenced for these rates can be difficult to find.